Graduate project · Clinical eLearning

Building clinical judgment with practice, context, and care.

A scenario-based course for community pharmacists taking on PrEP prescribing: patient assessment, stigma-aware conversations, and decisions under provincial rules that differ.

Articulate Rise Storyline SCORM Healthcare
5 provinces

Community pharmacists and clinicians across five Canadian provinces.


Built in Articulate Rise and Storyline, with AI-supported research tools.

The problem

Facts were not the hard part.

01

Fragmented training

Pharmacists face different provincial rules and uneven access to practical PrEP training.

02

Sensitive conversations

Learners need language for discussing HIV, sexuality, risk, and substance use with respect and confidence.

03

Clinical judgment

Safe prescribing means applying frameworks to real patient situations, not memorizing facts.

What I built

Realistic cases, branching choices, and the social context behind PrEP.

  • ScenariosBranching patient cases let learners practice eligibility assessment and the conversation itself.
  • ContextHistory and community context connect PrEP to stigma and public health, not just pharmacology.
  • ScopeThe course maps provincial scope differences so learners know what applies where they practise.
  • AdaptableThe structure can be updated as practice standards and scopes keep changing.
A patient-pharmacist roleplay: learners choose how to open a PrEP consultation.
A patient-pharmacist roleplay: learners choose how to open a PrEP consultation.
The history section, which sets the social context for the clinical content.
The history section, which sets the social context for the clinical content.

Try the interactions

Two interactions from the course.

Explore HIV rates across Canada. Select a province to see its data.

Myth versus reality interaction

This interaction helps learners challenge assumptions about HIV, stigma, and the LGBTQ+ community before moving into patient assessment and prescribing decisions.
Open GIF in Google Drive

Evaluation strategy

How I’d know whether this course actually worked.

No cohort has gone through this course yet, so this is a proposed strategy, not a results report. It tracks training investment, learner capability, workplace behaviour, organizational results, and potential ROI as five separate links, because a passing assessment is evidence of learning, not proof of practice.

The central argument: organizational reach, not learner competence, is where a program like this is most likely to fail. A pharmacist can pass and still have no impact if too few are trained, pharmacies don’t promote the service, or patients never hear about it. So the Level 4 measures track reach and implementation first.

Read the full evaluation strategy

Feedback

“Devon took a topic that could have felt very clinical and made it feel connected to the people behind it. The course covered the practical side of prescribing PrEP, but also helped learners understand the role pharmacists can play in improving access to care and supporting LGBTQ+ patients.”

Pharmacy Professional & Subject Matter ExpertPrEP Prescribing Course · Graduate project

Demo

See it in the LMS.

The demo runs as a SCORM package inside Moodle, with real navigation and tracking. It is hosted on Gnomio’s free plan, so you’ll see ad banners around the course player; those come from the hosting, not the course.

Open the LMS version